<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>“Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty”   Bertrand Russell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A Simple Technique #1 by Dave L. Renfro</title>
		<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/a-simple-technique-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave L. Renfro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I happend to stumble on your 11:59 P.M. 29 December 2008 blog entry and was reminded of a similar algebraic manipulation I came up with back in August 2008 (and have since learned is rather standard, at least in late 1800s texts). Follow the URL I pasted in the &#039;Website&#039; window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happend to stumble on your 11:59 P.M. 29 December 2008 blog entry and was reminded of a similar algebraic manipulation I came up with back in August 2008 (and have since learned is rather standard, at least in late 1800s texts). Follow the URL I pasted in the &#8216;Website&#8217; window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This 2009! by Mike</title>
		<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/this-2009/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 10:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Just passing by.Btw, you website have great content!

_________________________________
Making Money &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/rich-quickly/1079508&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;$150 An Hour&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just passing by.Btw, you website have great content!</p>
<p>_________________________________<br />
Making Money <a href="http://tinyurl.com/rich-quickly/1079508" rel="nofollow">$150 An Hour</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The number 5040 &#8211; according to Plato by David</title>
		<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/2008/12/30/the-number-5040-according-to-plato/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-110</guid>
		<description>No, Plato didn&#039;t include women, slaves or children. The actual number of inhabitants should be around 50 000 (Knack &amp; Azfar 2000:3)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Plato didn&#8217;t include women, slaves or children. The actual number of inhabitants should be around 50 000 (Knack &amp; Azfar 2000:3)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This 2009! by Joe Nahhas</title>
		<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/this-2009/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Nahhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Einstein&#039;s Nemesis: DI Her Eclipsing Binary Stars Solution
The problem that the 100,000 PHD Physicists  could not solve  

This is the solution to the &quot;Quarter of a century&quot; Smithsonian-NASA Posted motion puzzle that Einstein and the 100,000 space-time physicists including 109 years of Nobel prize winner physics and physicists and 400 years of astronomy and Astrophysicists could not solve and solved here and dedicated to Drs Edward Guinan and Frank Maloney      
Of Villanova University Pennsylvania who posted this motion puzzle and started the search collections of stars with motion that can not be explained by any published physics   
For 350 years Physicists Astrophysicists and Mathematicians and all others including Newton and Kepler themselves missed the time-dependent Newton&#039;s equation and time dependent Kepler&#039;s equation that accounts for Quantum - relativistic effects and it explains these effects as visual effects. Here it is  

Universal- Mechanics

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location 
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product 

S = m r; State = mass x location

P = d S/d t = m (d r/dt) + (dm/dt) r = Total moment 

  = change of location + change of mass

  = m v + m&#039; r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m&#039; = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

   = m γ + 2m&#039;v +m&quot;r; γ = acceleration; m&#039;&#039; = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

r = r r(1) ;v = r&#039; r(1)  + r θ&#039; θ(1) ; γ = (r&quot; - rθ&#039;²)r(1) + (2r&#039;θ&#039; + rθ&quot;)θ(1)

F = m[(r&quot;-rθ&#039;²)r(1) + (2r&#039;θ&#039; + rθ&quot;)θ(1)] + 2m&#039;[r&#039;r(1) + rθ&#039;θ(1)] + (m&quot;r) r(1)
  
F = [d²(m r)/dt² - (m r)θ&#039;²]r(1) + (1/mr)[d(m²r²θ&#039;)/d t]θ(1) = [-GmM/r²]r(1)

d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ&#039;² = -GmM/r²; d (m²r²θ&#039;)/d t = 0

Let m =constant: M=constant

d²r/dt² -  r θ&#039;²=-GM/r²  ------ I

 d(r²θ&#039;)/d t = 0   -----------------II

r²θ&#039;=h = constant -------------- II     
                                                 r = 1/u; r&#039; = -u&#039;/u² = - r²u&#039; = - r²θ&#039;(d u/d θ) = -h (d u/d θ)                                 
d (r²θ&#039;)/d t = 2rr&#039;θ&#039; + r²θ&quot; = 0        r&quot; = - h d/d t (du/d θ) = - h θ&#039;(d²u/d θ²) = - (h²/r²)(d²u/dθ²)
                                                                  [- (h²/r²) (d²u/dθ²)] - r [(h/r²)²] = -GM/r²              
2(r&#039;/r) = - (θ&quot;/θ&#039;) = 2[λ + ỉ ω (t)]                              - h²u² (d²u/dθ²) - h²u³ = -GMu²
                                                                                                d²u/dθ² + u = GM/h²             
 r(θ, t) = r (θ, 0) Exp [λ + ỉ ω (t)]    u(θ,0) = GM/h² + Acosθ; r (θ, 0) = 1/(GM/h² + Acosθ)        
                                                         r ( θ, 0) = h²/GM/[1 + (Ah²/Gm)cosθ]      
r(θ,0) = a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)               ; h²/GM = a(1-ε²); ε = Ah²/GM                

 r(0,t)= Exp[λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)]t; Exp = Exponential

r = r(θ , t)=r(θ,0)r(0,t)=[a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[λ(r) + ì ω(r)]t} Nahhas&#039; Solution

If λ(r) ≈ 0; then:    

r (θ, t) = [(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[ỉ ω(r)t]

θ&#039;(r,  t) = θ&#039;[r(θ,0), 0]  Exp{-2ỉ[ω(r)t]} 

h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity
h = 2πa²√ (1-ε²); r (0, 0) = a (1-ε)

θ&#039; (0,0) = h/r²(0,0) =  2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²   
θ&#039; (0,t) = θ&#039;(0,0)Exp(-2ỉwt)={2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²} Exp (-2iwt)
 
θ&#039;(0,t) = θ&#039;(0,0) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = θ&#039;(0,0) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)] 
θ&#039;(0,t) = θ&#039;(0,t)(x) + θ&#039;(0,t)(y); θ&#039;(0,t)(x) = θ&#039;(0,0)[ 1- 2sine² (wt)]  
θ&#039;(0,t)(x) – θ&#039;(0,0) = - 2θ&#039;(0,0)sine²(wt) = - 2θ&#039;(0,0)(v/c)²  v/c=sine wt; c=light speed

Δ θ&#039; = [θ&#039;(0, t) - θ&#039;(0, 0)] = -4π {[√ (1-ε) ²]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ²} radians/second
{(180/π=degrees) x (36526=century) 

Δ θ&#039; = [-720x36526/ T (days)] {[√ (1-ε) ²]/ (1-ε) ²}(v/c) = 1.04°/century

This is the T-Rex equation that is going to demolished Einstein&#039;s space-jail of time
  
The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²---) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)
 v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m&lt;&lt;M; Solar system    

 v = v (center of mass); v is the sum of orbital/rotational velocities = v(cm) for DI Her
Let m = mass of primary; M = mass of secondary

v (m) = primary speed; v(M) = secondary speed = √[Gm²/(m+M)a(1-ε²/4)]
v (cm) = [m v(m) + M v(M)]/(m + M)   All rights reserved. joenahhas1958@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Einstein&#8217;s Nemesis: DI Her Eclipsing Binary Stars Solution<br />
The problem that the 100,000 PHD Physicists  could not solve  </p>
<p>This is the solution to the &#8220;Quarter of a century&#8221; Smithsonian-NASA Posted motion puzzle that Einstein and the 100,000 space-time physicists including 109 years of Nobel prize winner physics and physicists and 400 years of astronomy and Astrophysicists could not solve and solved here and dedicated to Drs Edward Guinan and Frank Maloney<br />
Of Villanova University Pennsylvania who posted this motion puzzle and started the search collections of stars with motion that can not be explained by any published physics<br />
For 350 years Physicists Astrophysicists and Mathematicians and all others including Newton and Kepler themselves missed the time-dependent Newton&#8217;s equation and time dependent Kepler&#8217;s equation that accounts for Quantum &#8211; relativistic effects and it explains these effects as visual effects. Here it is  </p>
<p>Universal- Mechanics</p>
<p>All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location<br />
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product </p>
<p>S = m r; State = mass x location</p>
<p>P = d S/d t = m (d r/dt) + (dm/dt) r = Total moment </p>
<p>  = change of location + change of mass</p>
<p>  = m v + m&#8217; r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m&#8217; = mass change rate</p>
<p>F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r</p>
<p>   = m γ + 2m&#8217;v +m&#8221;r; γ = acceleration; m&#8221; = mass acceleration rate</p>
<p>In polar coordinates system</p>
<p>r = r r(1) ;v = r&#8217; r(1)  + r θ&#8217; θ(1) ; γ = (r&#8221; &#8211; rθ&#8217;²)r(1) + (2r&#8217;θ&#8217; + rθ&#8221;)θ(1)</p>
<p>F = m[(r"-rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + rθ")θ(1)] + 2m&#8217;[r'r(1) + rθ'θ(1)] + (m&#8221;r) r(1)</p>
<p>F = [d²(m r)/dt² - (m r)θ'²]r(1) + (1/mr)[d(m²r²θ')/d t]θ(1) = [-GmM/r²]r(1)</p>
<p>d² (m r)/dt² &#8211; (m r) θ&#8217;² = -GmM/r²; d (m²r²θ&#8217;)/d t = 0</p>
<p>Let m =constant: M=constant</p>
<p>d²r/dt² &#8211;  r θ&#8217;²=-GM/r²  &#8212;&#8212; I</p>
<p> d(r²θ&#8217;)/d t = 0   &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;II</p>
<p>r²θ&#8217;=h = constant &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; II<br />
                                                 r = 1/u; r&#8217; = -u&#8217;/u² = &#8211; r²u&#8217; = &#8211; r²θ&#8217;(d u/d θ) = -h (d u/d θ)<br />
d (r²θ&#8217;)/d t = 2rr&#8217;θ&#8217; + r²θ&#8221; = 0        r&#8221; = &#8211; h d/d t (du/d θ) = &#8211; h θ&#8217;(d²u/d θ²) = &#8211; (h²/r²)(d²u/dθ²)<br />
                                                                  [- (h²/r²) (d²u/dθ²)] &#8211; r [(h/r²)²] = -GM/r²<br />
2(r&#8217;/r) = &#8211; (θ&#8221;/θ&#8217;) = 2[λ + ỉ ω (t)]                              &#8211; h²u² (d²u/dθ²) &#8211; h²u³ = -GMu²<br />
                                                                                                d²u/dθ² + u = GM/h²<br />
 r(θ, t) = r (θ, 0) Exp [λ + ỉ ω (t)]    u(θ,0) = GM/h² + Acosθ; r (θ, 0) = 1/(GM/h² + Acosθ)<br />
                                                         r ( θ, 0) = h²/GM/[1 + (Ah²/Gm)cosθ]<br />
r(θ,0) = a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)               ; h²/GM = a(1-ε²); ε = Ah²/GM                </p>
<p> r(0,t)= Exp[λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)]t; Exp = Exponential</p>
<p>r = r(θ , t)=r(θ,0)r(0,t)=[a(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[λ(r) + ì ω(r)]t} Nahhas&#8217; Solution</p>
<p>If λ(r) ≈ 0; then:    </p>
<p>r (θ, t) = [(1-ε²)/(1+εcosθ)]{Exp[ỉ ω(r)t]</p>
<p>θ&#8217;(r,  t) = θ&#8217;[r(θ,0), 0]  Exp{-2ỉ[ω(r)t]} </p>
<p>h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity<br />
h = 2πa²√ (1-ε²); r (0, 0) = a (1-ε)</p>
<p>θ&#8217; (0,0) = h/r²(0,0) =  2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²<br />
θ&#8217; (0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,0)Exp(-2ỉwt)={2π[√(1-ε²)]/T(1-ε)²} Exp (-2iwt)</p>
<p>θ&#8217;(0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,0) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = θ&#8217;(0,0) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)]<br />
θ&#8217;(0,t) = θ&#8217;(0,t)(x) + θ&#8217;(0,t)(y); θ&#8217;(0,t)(x) = θ&#8217;(0,0)[ 1- 2sine² (wt)]<br />
θ&#8217;(0,t)(x) – θ&#8217;(0,0) = &#8211; 2θ&#8217;(0,0)sine²(wt) = &#8211; 2θ&#8217;(0,0)(v/c)²  v/c=sine wt; c=light speed</p>
<p>Δ θ&#8217; = [θ'(0, t) - θ'(0, 0)] = -4π {[√ (1-ε) ²]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ²} radians/second<br />
{(180/π=degrees) x (36526=century) </p>
<p>Δ θ&#8217; = [-720x36526/ T (days)] {[√ (1-ε) ²]/ (1-ε) ²}(v/c) = 1.04°/century</p>
<p>This is the T-Rex equation that is going to demolished Einstein&#8217;s space-jail of time</p>
<p>The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 &#8211; ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²&#8212;) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)<br />
 v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m&lt;&lt;M; Solar system    </p>
<p> v = v (center of mass); v is the sum of orbital/rotational velocities = v(cm) for DI Her<br />
Let m = mass of primary; M = mass of secondary</p>
<p>v (m) = primary speed; v(M) = secondary speed = √[Gm²/(m+M)a(1-ε²/4)]<br />
v (cm) = [m v(m) + M v(M)]/(m + M)   All rights reserved. <a href="mailto:joenahhas1958@yahoo.com">joenahhas1958@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The number 5040 &#8211; according to Plato by jd2718</title>
		<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/2008/12/30/the-number-5040-according-to-plato/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>jd2718</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-104</guid>
		<description>But does that 5040 include children? slaves? women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But does that 5040 include children? slaves? women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Value of a in ax+b by Vishal Lama</title>
		<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/2008/12/27/value-of-a-in-axb/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal Lama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Great! But, since you didn&#039;t explicitly mention the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynomial_remainder_theorem&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Remainder Theorem&lt;/a&gt;, I thought there would be no harm in mentioning it. Your solution actually contains a &quot;proof&quot; of the Remainder Theorem for a special case that can be easily generalized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! But, since you didn&#8217;t explicitly mention the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynomial_remainder_theorem" rel="nofollow">Remainder Theorem</a>, I thought there would be no harm in mentioning it. Your solution actually contains a &#8220;proof&#8221; of the Remainder Theorem for a special case that can be easily generalized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 25th number by jd2718</title>
		<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/2008/12/26/25th-number/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>jd2718</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 02:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I like your solution, but I do not agree that listing 25 5-digit numbers is impractical (and we don&#039;t need to list the other 85)

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your solution, but I do not agree that listing 25 5-digit numbers is impractical (and we don&#8217;t need to list the other 85)</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Value of a in ax+b by Carlos</title>
		<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/2008/12/27/value-of-a-in-axb/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 02:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-101</guid>
		<description>$interesting$ 

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$interesting$ </p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mathematical Beauty by Nic</title>
		<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/mathematical-beauty/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-100</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just wondering who this cute girl is.
   - a nerdy loner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just wondering who this cute girl is.<br />
   &#8211; a nerdy loner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CNN: Dr. Ronald Mallett&#8217;s Time Travel Machine [Video] by Richard</title>
		<link>http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/cnn-dr-ronald-malletts-time-travel-machine-video/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosapaulina.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-98</guid>
		<description>We adore Dr.Ronald Mallett.Here at N.I,he is one of our favourites.
Thanks to his dedication.


With regards,\


N.I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We adore Dr.Ronald Mallett.Here at N.I,he is one of our favourites.<br />
Thanks to his dedication.</p>
<p>With regards,\</p>
<p>N.I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
