17
Aug
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: Euclidean Geometry, Geometry, Math, Mathematics, plane geometry. Leave a Comment
From The Mathematics Student Journal
ACJD, CBGH and BAEF are squares constructed outwardly on the sides of triangle ABC. DE, FG and HJ are drawn. If the sum of the areas of squares BAEF and CBGH is equal to the area of the rest of the figure, find the measure of angle ABC.
My Solution:
Let [ABC] denotes the area of triangle ABC and angle ABC = α, angle BAC = β, angle BCA = γ. Given that the sum of [BAEF] and[CBGH] is equal to area of the rest of the figure, we have:
(AB)2 + (BC)2 = [FBG] + [ABC] + (AC)2 + [AED] + [HCJ] (1)
Now [FBG] = [ABC] = [AED] = [HCJ] because
[FBG] = (1/2)(FB)(BG)sin(180 – α) = (1/2)(AB)(BC)sin α = [ABC] ,
[AED] = (1/2)(AE)(AD)sin(180 – β) = (1/2)(AB)(AC)sin β = [ABC]
and [HCJ] = (1/2)(HC)(CJ)sin(180 – γ) = (1/2)(BC)(AC)sin γ = [ABC] .
Equation (1) becomes
(AB)2 + (BC)2 = (AC)2 + 2(AB)(BC)sin α
Replacing (AC)2 using cosine law,
(AB)2 + (BC)2 = (AB)2 + (BC)2 – 2(AB)(BC)cos α + 2(AB)(BC)sin α
cos α = sin α
α = angle ABC = 45 degrees.
17
Aug
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: Divisibility, Math, Mathematics, number theory, proving. Leave a Comment
From a friend:
If
prove that p is divisible by 641.
My Solution:
-3(\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{6}+\frac{1}{9}...+\frac{1}{480}))
-(1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{9}...+\frac{1}{160}))

+(\frac{1}{162}+\frac{1}{479})+...+(\frac{1}{240}+\frac{1}{241}))
(480)}+\frac{1}{(162)(479)}+...+\frac{1}{(240)(241)}])
Since 641 is a prime number and it is not present in denominator, hence p is divisible by 641.
11
Apr
Posted by rosapaulina in Physics. Tagged: classical mechanics, incline, inclined plane, mechanics, Physics, projectile. Leave a Comment

My Solution:

Based from the above figure point
can also be denoted as
.
From kinematics equations for constant acceleration (at time t):


It follows that

}{4.9\cos \phi})
Hence,
}{4.9\cos ^{2}\phi})
11
Apr
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: Math, Mathematics, sine, trigonometry. Leave a Comment
Compute the exact value of 
My Solution:
Since
and if we set 
Then,
=\cos x)

(1-2\sin^{2}x)=\cos x)

Let 

(y^{2}+y-1)=0)
The only applicable value of
is 
Therefore,

25
Oct
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: algebra, Math, Math contest, Math olympiad, Mathematics, olympiad, PMO, radical, simplify. 4 Comments
Simplify:

From Philippine Mathematical Olympiad 2009




9
May
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: binomial, binomial theorem, combination, combinatorics, identity, Math, Mathematics, permutation, summation. 2 Comments
1) Prove:

My Solution:
The above expression can be simplified as

Applying binomial theorem,
^n=\sum_{r=0}^{n}\binom{n}{r}x^{n-r}y^r)
setting x=1 and y=8
^n=\sum_{r=0}^{n}\binom{n}{r} 1^{n-r}8^r)
Thus,

2) Show that
)
My Solution:
The simplified version of the above expression is

Using binomial theorem,
Letting x=1
^n=\sum_{r=0}^{n}\binom{n}{r}y^r)
Integrating both sides,
^{n+1}}{n+1} + C = \sum_{r=0}^{n}\frac{1}{r+1}\binom{n}{r}y^{r+1})
setting y=1

The last step is solving for C
If y=0, then


Therefore,

)
9
May
Posted by rosapaulina in Astronomy, Physics. Tagged: expansion, galaxy, Hubble, Hubble's law, Math, Mathematics, Milky way, Physics, ratio, recession, universe, vector, vector analysis. Leave a Comment
Hubble’s law: Hubble found that distant galaxies are receding with a velocity proportional to their distance (HO is the Hubble constant) from where we are on Earth. For the ith galaxy: 
with our Milky way galaxy at the origin. Show that this recession of the galaxies from us does not imply that we are at the center of universe.
Source: Exercise 1.1.9 of Essential Mathematical Methods for Physicists by H.Weber and G.Arfken
My Solution:
By Hubble’s law,

Now by setting the galaxy at r1 as new origin and using the concept of vectors, we have the following ratios:

Since we have this property of ratio:

Then,
;
Which means that Hubble’s law is still obeyed if another galaxy is set as new origin! (still applicable aside from using the galaxy at r1)
Therefore, the recession of galaxies from us indicates that we are not necessary at the center of universe…
9
May
Posted by rosapaulina in Physics. Tagged: gas constant, Gibbs free energy, molar specific heat, Physics, real gas, specific heat, thermodynamics. 1 Comment
A system is found to have a Gibbs Free Energy of
![G=RT\ln [\frac{aP}{(RT)^\frac{5}{2}}]](http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?G=RT%5Cln%20[%5Cfrac%7BaP%7D%7B%28RT%29%5E%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D%7D])
Find 
Notations:
CP – molar specific heat at constant pressure
G – Gibbs Free Energy
R – universal gas constant
T – temperature
P – pressure
a – one of the constants in Van der Waals equation
Q – energy transferred (heat)
S – entropy
My Solution:
Method – relate Gibbs free Energy expression to another thermodynamic variable using Maxwell’s relations and then relate this variable to the known equation for molar specific heat at constant pressure.
Using Maxwell’s relations, we find that

Then
![-S=(\frac{\partial (RT\ln [\frac{aP}{(RT)^\frac{5}{2}}] )}{\partial T})_P](http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?-S=%28%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20%28RT%5Cln%20[%5Cfrac%7BaP%7D%7B%28RT%29%5E%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D%7D]%20%29%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20T%7D%29_P)
![S=\frac{5}{2}R -R\ln [aP(RT)^\frac{-5}{2}]](http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?S=%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7DR%20-R%5Cln%20[aP%28RT%29%5E%5Cfrac%7B-5%7D%7B2%7D])
Since

We have
![C_P=T(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T})_P=T(\frac{\partial (\frac{5}{2}R-R\ln [aP(RT)^\frac{-5}{2}])}{\partial T})_P](http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?C_P=T%28%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20S%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20T%7D%29_P=T%28%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20%28%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7DR-R%5Cln%20[aP%28RT%29%5E%5Cfrac%7B-5%7D%7B2%7D]%29%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20T%7D%29_P)
By simplifying,

29
Dec
Posted by rosapaulina in Physics. Tagged: adiabatic, compressibility, isothermal, Physics, proving, Theoretical Physics, thermodynamics. Leave a Comment
Show that the difference between the isothermal and adiabatic compressibility is:

Notations:
kT – isothermal compressibility
kP – adiabatic compressibility
T – Temperature
V – Volume
Beta – Coefficient of volume expansion
CP – molar specific heat at constant pressure
R – universal gas constant
S – entropy
CV – molar specific heat at constant volume
From the following definitions:
Coefficient of volume expansion -
_P)
Adiabatic compressibility -
_S)
Isothermal compressibility -
_T)
Proof:
For the right side of the equation,
![\frac{TV\beta^2%20}{C_P}%3D\frac{TV}{C_P}[\frac{1}{V}(\frac{\partial%20V}{\partial%20T})_P]^2%3D\frac{T}{C_P%20V}[(\frac{\partial%20V}{\partial%20T})_P]^2](http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?\frac{TV\beta^2%20}{C_P}%3D\frac{TV}{C_P}[\frac{1}{V}(\frac{\partial%20V}{\partial%20T})_P]^2%3D\frac{T}{C_P%20V}[(\frac{\partial%20V}{\partial%20T})_P]^2)
^2%3D\frac{TR^2}{VC_P%20P^2}%3D\frac{R}{PC_P})
For isothermal compressibility,
![k_T%3D-\frac{1}{V}(\frac{\partial%20V}{\partial%20P})_T%3D-\frac{1}{V}[\frac{\partial%20(\frac{RT}{P}%20)}{\partial%20P}]_T%3D\frac{RT}{VP^2}](http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?k_T%3D-\frac{1}{V}(\frac{\partial%20V}{\partial%20P})_T%3D-\frac{1}{V}[\frac{\partial%20(\frac{RT}{P}%20)}{\partial%20P}]_T%3D\frac{RT}{VP^2})
For adiabatic compressibility,
Since S is constant it follows that

Then,

_S%3D\frac{1}{V}\frac{dV}{dP}%3D\frac{-C_V}{TR}\frac{dT}{dP}%3D\frac{-C_V}{PV}\frac{dT}{dP})
Solving first for the derivative of T with respect to P,

We have,
_S%3D\frac{-C_V}{PV}(\frac{V}{C_P})%3D\frac{-C_V}{PC_P})

}{VC_P%20P^2%20}%3D\frac{PVR}{VC_P%20P^2}%3D\frac{R}{PC_P})
Since

Therefore,

29
Dec
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: algebra, formula, Math, Mathematics, sum. Leave a Comment
Find a formula for:
(2)(3)}%2B\frac{1}{(2)(3)(4)}%2B\frac{1}{(3)(4)(5)}%2B%20.....%20%2B%20\frac{1}{(n)(n%2B1)(n%2B2)})
My Solution:
Since
(n%2B1)(n%2B2)}%20%3D%20\frac{1}{2n}-\frac{1}{n%2B1}%2B\frac{1}{2(n%2B2)})
We have,
(2)(3)}%2B\frac{1}{(2)(3)(4)}%2B\frac{1}{(3)(4)(5)}%2B%20.....%20%2B%20\frac{1}{(n)(n%2B1)(n%2B2)})

-(\frac{1}{2}%2B\frac{1}{3}%2B...%2B\frac{1}{n}%2B\frac{1}{n%2B1})%2B\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3}%2B\frac{1}{4}%2B...%2B\frac{1}{n%2B2}))
-\frac{1}{n%2B1}%2B\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3}%2B\frac{1}{4}%2B...%2B\frac{1}{n%2B2}))
-\frac{1}{n%2B1}%2B\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{n%2B1}%2B\frac{1}{n%2B2}))
}%2B\frac{1}{2(n%2B2)})
(n%2B2)-2(n%2B2)%2B2(n%2B1)}{4(n%2B1)(n%2B2)}%3D\frac{n(n%2B3)}{4(n%2B1)(n%2B2)})
Thus,
(2)(3)}%2B\frac{1}{(2)(3)(4)}%2B\frac{1}{(3)(4)(5)}%2B%20.....%20%2B%20\frac{1}{(n)(n%2B1)(n%2B2)})
}{4(n%2B1)(n%2B2)})
26
Oct
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: fallacy, false proof, Math, math error, Math proof, Mathematics, number theory, numbers, numerical analysis, proof. 1 Comment
Here are some examples of false Mathematical proofs:
Number 1:

(-1)}%3D1%2B%20(\sqrt{-1}\sqrt{-1}))
(i)%3D1%2Bi^2)
)

Number 2:




%3D%20\sqrt{1}\sqrt{-1}(\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\sqrt{-1}}))

(i)%3D(1)(1))

Number 3 (the famous one):
let: 


(a%2Bb)%3D(b)(a-b))
(a%2Bb)}{a-b}%3D\frac{b(a-b)}{a-b})




Number 4:
(1-1) + (1-1) + … + (1-1) + (1-1) + … = 0
1 + (-1+1) + (-1+1) + … + (-1+1) + … = 0
1 + 0 + 0 +… + 0 + .. = 0
1 = 0
24
Oct
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: calculus, differential equations, equation, laplace, laplace transform, Math, Mathematics, proving, trigonometry. Leave a Comment
Prove that:
}{(s^2%20%2B%20k^2)(s^2%20%2B%209k^2)})
Solution:
First,
%3D(cos2kt)%20(cos%20kt)%20-%20(sin2kt)(sin%20kt))
(cos%20kt)%20-%202%20(sin^2%20kt)(cos%20kt))
(cos%20kt)%20-%202%20(1-cos^2%20kt)(cos%20kt))
%0A)

It follows that:

Then,

%20%2B%20\frac{3}{4}(\frac{s}{s^2%20%2B%20k^2})%3D\frac{s(s^2%20%2B%20k^2)%2B3s(s^2%20%2B9k^2)}{4(s^2%20%2B9k^2)(s^2%20%2Bk^2)})
(s^2%20%2Bk^2)}%3D\frac{4s^3%20%2B%2028sk^2}{4(s^2%20%2B9k^2)(s^2%20%2Bk^2)})
}{4(s^2%20%2B9k^2)(s^2%20%2Bk^2)}%3D%20\frac{s(s^2%20%2B%207k^2)}{(s^2%20%2B9k^2)(s^2%20%2Bk^2)})
Hence,
}{(s^2%20%2B%20k^2)(s^2%20%2B%209k^2)})
1
Jan
Posted by rosapaulina in Astronomy. Tagged: 2009, Astronomy, international, international year of astronomy, IYA, unesco, universe. 2 Comments

SHOWING THE UNIVERSE TO MILLIONS
ONE EARTH, ONE NIGHT SKY
CLICK HERE
30
Dec
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics, Philosophy. Tagged: 5040, city, fact, factor, greek, idea, ideal city, numbers, philosopher, Plato, population. 2 Comments
5 040 – Greek philosopher Plato gave this number as the population of an ideal city.

This number has several factors, which implies an efficient division of population for the sake of land distribution, taxes, war etc.
In fact,
5, 040 = 7! = (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
5, 040 = (24)(32)(51)(71)
Thus, 5 040 has (4+1)(2+1)(1+1)(1+1) = 60 factors
29
Dec
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: algebra, calculator, compute, Math, Mathematics, numbers, technique, without calculator. 1 Comment
Compute
in (less than) 30 seconds without using calculator.
My technique:
Since 2007 is the arithmetic mean of the numbers 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2010, then: Let x = 2007
So, x-3 = 2004, x-1 = 2006, x+1 = 2008, x+3 = 2010
Hence, the expression is equal to (x-1)(x%2B1)(x%2B3)%2B16%7D)
Simplifying,

= x2 – 5 = (2007)2 – 5 = 4, 028, 044
27
Dec
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: algebra, division, elimination, factor, factor theorem, Math, Mathematics, polynomial, remainder, remainder theorem. 2 Comments
When the polynomial x2007 + 1 is divided by x2 – 3x +2, the remainder can be expressed in the form ax+b. Find the value of a.
My Solution:
Let k be the quotient, then:
x2007 + 1 = k(x2 – 3x +2) + (ax+b)
Since x2 – 3x +2 = (x-2)(x-1),
x2007 + 1 = k(x-2)(x-1) + (ax+b)
To omit k and to solve for the value of a easily, set x=2 and x=1:
For x=2
(2)2007 + 1= k(2-2)(2-1) + (2a+b)
22007 + 1= 2a+b (*)
For x=1
(1)2007 + 1 = k(1-2)(1-1) + (a+b)
2 = a+b (**)
To solve for the value of a, perform elimination using (*) and (**).
..Which in turns give: a=22007-1
26
Dec
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: combinatorics, exponent, law of exponent, Math, Mathematics, numbers, numerical analysis, perfect square, square. Leave a Comment
Compute the number of squares between 49 and 94
My short solution: The technique is to express these two numbers into perfect squares so that it’s easy to compute the number of squares between these two numbers.
49 = (22)9 = (29)2 = 5122 ;
94 = (32)4 = (34)2 = 812
Therefore, the number of squares between 49 and 94 is (512-81)-1 = 430
26
Dec
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: arrangement, combinatorics, digits, five digit number, Math, Mathematics, numbers, numerical analysis. 1 Comment
Five digit numbers containing all digits from 1-5 are arranged from highest to lowest. What is the 25th number?
(Examples of these numbers are 54 321; 23 451; 41 532)
My Solution:
First, it’s impractical to list these (5)(4)(3)(2)(1)=120 numbers from highest to lowest and then determine the 25th number in the list. So, we can instead do some technique and investigate the distribution of these numbers.
Since it’s from highest to lowest, the first step is to determine the number of these five digit numbers which have a ten thousands digit of 5.
For thousands digit: 4 numbers to choose.
For hundreds digit: 3 numbers to choose.
For tens digit: 2 numbers to choose.
For unit digit: 1 number to choose.
Thus, the number of these 5 digit numbers which have a ten thousands digit of 5 is (4)(3)(2)(1)=24. Then these 24 numbers are the first 24 numbers in the list. Hence, the 25th number is the highest number which has a ten thousands digit of 4. And this 25th number is 45 321.
23
Dec
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics. Tagged: calculus, differential calculus, e, limit, Math, Mathematics, number e, proof, proving. Leave a Comment
Prove that:
, for any 
Solution: Since
, then in order to produce a short
proof, the expression
should be express in the form ^y)
Doing so,
![%20%20(1%20%2B%20\frac{x}{n})^n%20%3D%20%20[(1%20%2B%20\frac{1}{\frac{n}{x}})^\frac{n}{x}]^x](http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?%20%20(1%20%2B%20\frac{x}{n})^n%20%3D%20%20[(1%20%2B%20\frac{1}{\frac{n}{x}})^\frac{n}{x}]^x)
Hence,
![\mathop{\lim}\limits_{n%20\to%20\infty}%20%20(1%20%2B%20\frac{x}{n})^n%20%3D%20\mathop{\lim}\limits_{n%20\to%20\infty}%20[(1%20%2B%20\frac{1}{\frac{n}{x}})^\frac{n}{x}]^x](http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?\mathop{\lim}\limits_{n%20\to%20\infty}%20%20(1%20%2B%20\frac{x}{n})^n%20%3D%20\mathop{\lim}\limits_{n%20\to%20\infty}%20[(1%20%2B%20\frac{1}{\frac{n}{x}})^\frac{n}{x}]^x)
![%20%3D%20[\mathop{\lim}\limits_{n%20\to%20\infty}%20(1%20%2B%20\frac{1}{\frac{n}{x}})^\frac{n}{x}]^x%20%3D%20e^x](http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?%20%3D%20[\mathop{\lim}\limits_{n%20\to%20\infty}%20(1%20%2B%20\frac{1}{\frac{n}{x}})^\frac{n}{x}]^x%20%3D%20e^x)

20
May
Posted by rosapaulina in Mathematics, Physics. Tagged: beauty, Dirac, Math, mathematical beauty, Mathematics, Paul Dirac, physical theory, simplicity, surprise, theory. 5 Comments

“A physical theory must possess mathematical beauty.”
In the most basic explanation, mathematical beauty is related to simplicity and surprise.
- Paul Dirac, quantum physicist



Recent Comments